The Agnostic Gnostic

I count myself fortunate to have a small number of close friends who can ask me challenging questions in a respectful but fairly direct manner. One such friend having read my recent book A Gnostic’s Progress had some pointy inquiries about how could we really know anything, and whether the pursuit of such occult know-how was ultimately a distraction from the real business of the here and now. He wondered whether, given the various twists and turns that my spiritual journey has taken, would I want an answer to my seemingly endless questioning? Would I even know what an answer looked like if I arrived at one?

These are great questions and while I may not have great or immediate answers, I thought it would be of value to reflect on them. What follows is less an attempt at direct wrestling and more an Aikido like wiggle slightly out of the way so as to move with the energy of the challenge they may represent.

The Gnosis of Not Knowing

“Well if you are a Gnostic then shouldn’t you know stuff?”

Now this is a good question and you might rightly wonder why anyone would pursue a gnostic path if they didn’t end up knowing more. Paradoxically however, when I try to compare the nature of what I know now, compared to what I thought I knew when I was following a faith based path, I am fairly sure that I am less certain about a whole range of things!

Part of my ongoing fascination with the Gnostic current is the way in which it seeks to grapple with the unknown. Its vivid myths are replete with alien gods and mysterious realms that defy description. As human beings look up at the night sky or plumb the depths of dark seas, we are confronted (and potentially terrified) by mystery. Of course we can aspire through our science and art to gain greater understanding of the hidden dimensions of what’s out there (or indeed in here), but this process of self-reflection and wondering is arguably an essential part of our experience of consciousness.


Confused by alien gods?

I have written previously about the dangers of “unsafe certainty” i.e. a type of certainty based on absolutes that struggles with new information and insights. Often it feels that my great moments of Gnosis or Insight relate to the potential limits to what I can and can’t know. While the historic Gnostics were somewhat renowned for their complex cosmologies with multiple layers inhabited by a multitude of beings, the value for me of such perspectives is far less about adopting weirder world views and far more about using them to help access a greater sense of cognitive liberty. My own experience of trying to work with the Gnostic myths has had some similarity to Zen koan study i.e. the difficulty in trying to comprehend these schemas intellectually, has driven me towards a sense of knowing that seems to occur at a deeper, more integrated level. The gaining of such insight is rarely a straight line, once-for-always experience; rather it is a spiralling process where one has moments of internal spaciousness that come in and out of view as we live our lives.

Famously, the Zen practitioner seeks to engage in their endeavours with “Great Faith, Great Doubt and Great Courage”. Given that Zen Buddhist practice is generally less preoccupied with externalised metaphysical preoccupations, the emphasis on Great Faith is often seen as relating to faith or belief in the process of our own practice in relationship with both teacher and Sangha (community). My own journey into working with the Gnostic tradition has similarly been focused on strengthening or cultivating my ability to receive new information while simultaneously using doubt and questioning as tools to unburden myself from perspectives that are now outdated. This is also where Great Courage comes in! If we no longer believe in the certainties of a given orthodoxy and we seek to place greater value on the process of personal spiritual insight, then quite radically we are asking people to take far greater responsibility for themselves. Some people frankly can’t handle this, especially if they experience their faith-based certainties as being an effective means of protection from life’s messiness.

Gnosis: So What?

In thinking about contemporary Gnosticism, I have already written about the need for the spiritually adventurous to move beyond the role of being an endlessly ranting rebel (not saying it can’t be fun for a while!) What this radical embrace of “safe uncertainty” seems to necessitate is a greater awareness of both what is arising in the moment as well as our need for relationships that nurture. In short, if belief in dogma no longer carries evidence of insight, we may need to be more discerning/demanding  of what behaviour you would hope to see (for both yourself and others) if such revelation has occurred.

In reflecting on the current shape of those groups and organisations that are claiming connection to historic Gnosticism, it seems significant that many of these bodies have a greater emphasis on the use of either sacraments or collective ritual practice. In contrast to cultures shaped by  a Protestant emphasis on intellectual ascent to the dogma of creedal statements and scriptural authorities, those groups have a greater emphasis on the lived practice of ritual activity to provide both containment and guidance for their gnostic experience. For the flame of radical subjectivity to be nurtured and sustained, these shared rites arguably provide communal markers through which experiences can be triangulated and matured.


Some Gnostic Brothers

Some Gnostic Brothers

Perhaps this emphasis on practice and relationship gets closer to the heart of what it means to really know. Gnosis is just the beginning, a spark if you will that then needs to be tended. A good fire needs not only a source/spark, but also fuel and oxygen. For the Gnostic explorer to experience their insight as more sustaining, the spark of insight needs to be used and fed. This is a circular process in which we offer something to others and also acknowledge our need to receive. This reciprocal dynamic may entail the making of meals, the creation of Art, spending time listening, and so the list goes on. I can have endless amounts of weird shit going on in my head but unless I use it to do (for both myself and others), then we would be right to question its ultimate value.


2 thoughts on “The Agnostic Gnostic

  1. Mike Kay says:

    A very honest essay, Mr. D.
    I find your statement regarding the ranting rebel to be entirely prescient, especially in light of the needs of others for apparent structure, longevity, and protection. I would add that however much compassion one might muster for the cloistered shackles of organized religion, it was this institution that spearheaded the lust for murder and conformity that continues to both echo to this day, and to exist as something to be healed of…. Speaking personally, I have discovered that it was this institution that advanced and championed a singular level of consciousness, or at most, a dualistic one; ie, waking and sleeping.
    One of the aspects of a stratified consciousness, one which exists beyond simple waking/sleeping, is the holding of meaning which operates on varied levels.. As a runic student, I am keenly aware of the different levels of meaning and symbol extant and operating simultaneously in any runic work, and I have found that this state opens a greater reality beyond the sphere of that work.
    I am also keenly aware that this state exists in defiance of the judeochristian world view, now adopted by scientism and islam. Thus, the Gnostic will by necessity always rebel, and will always remain as a signifier of potential. In short, the unfolding of human potential has never been high on the to do list for aspiring power brokers, especially religious and ideological ones
    I found your description of Gnosis particularly interesting, and somewhat volitional. I wondered about this, and contrasted it to my own experience, where little, if any choice in the matter exists.
    Perhaps this is somewhat off topic, yet in my own life I find no evidence for genuine free will, or complete determinism, rather there is a nature to events that impels, and even compels. Thus, I must tend to Gnosis in my own life, what appears volitional is how exactly that is done.
    All in all, a welcome piece, sir.

  2. zenelf says:

    Thanks for your feedback Mike-while there may be shared motifs each of us will have our unique experience of gnostic awakening. Thinking about free will-whatever the ultimate reality of things I tend to adopt a world view that maximises at least the impression of being abele to make change 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s